Where innovators discuss world events and issues like alternative energy

Permalink Reply by Nicholas Nagao on May 20, 2010 at 9:46pm Robyn,
Great stuff. I have maintained about the same stance on these things until recently. First let me say I have a Blackberry and will be getting another one shortly (most likely hehe...here's why). I love my Blackberry for 2 main reasons.
1. The speakerphone is better than any phone including land lines I have ever used. That's a huge feature for me because it allows me to talk on the road more easily and I have a basic aversion to having something held against my head for long periods of time.
2. The call quality and phone functions like speed dial and texting are great.
However! Having seen the breakthroughs in application development due to the combination of a touch screen, GPS, data service everywhere, and a huge development community, I now see the iPhone is not really a phone. I am actually thinking about getting an iPhone as a gadget along with my Blackberry. If you take away the phone functions of the iPhone, I believe it's still an amazing electronic device. This is of course what the iPad is except that for 2 things. First it's much larger than the iPhone. That limits it's portability and it's ability to function as a phone. However, what it also does is allow you to have a full screen. This is going to allow for the first usable interactive video and richer eBook type media. Put that together with data anywhere with 3G and wireless internet and I can see the possibilities are almost endless. Will it replace a computer, probably not, but it will create a new type of media and appliance in my opinion.
Back on topic...I like the Android concept, but I'm not convinced this won't work out similarly to Linux versus Apple/Windows. Linux is great for many things, but not great for consumer oriented applications. This is partly because of the very thing that makes it great...the fact that it's open and so open design is more important than what's good for a specific feature that would really enhance the OS. There's also less incentive for the Google to keep up with Apple when they don't have as much skin in the game, as they are sharing the platform as opposed to being responsible for the whole brand themselves...just my $.02 though
Permalink Reply by Nicholas Nagao on May 20, 2010 at 10:03pm Hehe Robyn, the miniaturization technology must be measured by how many transistors they can fit per square centimeter and other such measurements, not on the size of the packaging ;)
Permalink Reply by Nicholas Nagao on May 20, 2010 at 10:25pm Robyn, I'm not sure I understand your definition of larger. It's lighter and thinner than a notebook, and even a netbook. It has very little space aside from the screen, so the size is a result of screen size, not inability to package it smaller. In some ways your comparison is like saying a 32" TV is better than a 60" TV simply because it's smaller. This is an especially good comparison in the case of the iPhone where features are almost identical, but where the main feature was it's phone features, the iPad's main feature is it's screen.
I held out on the iPhone because of functional requirements I have of a phone, but I already purchased an iPad for my mother and I plan to get one for myself once the 3G capabilities are there because I see some innovative ways to use it. I can see it being used it as a Heads up Display. It could enrich the world around you by telling you things about the things you're looking at. Say you're in a Mexico sight seeing, and you point the iPad/iPhone at a ruin in Tulum, or hiking and point it at a bird, plant, animal, and it identifies and gives you history about what you're looking at. What if there were games to play that got people out of their house and made use of this device to interact with the world in ways they never would have before because it makes it fun. These things are already being developed and used, and I really think these are the devices that will make the ENORMOUS amounts of data that is available now usable because it will digest that data and display it for us in ways we can interact with it easily. Sorry, I get excited sometimes ;)
Permalink Reply by Patricio Buenrostro-Gilhuys on May 21, 2010 at 2:12pm
Permalink Reply by Nicholas Nagao on May 21, 2010 at 2:19pm
Permalink Reply by Nicholas Nagao on May 21, 2010 at 2:20pm In the long run I think Android is better positioned. The new iPhone will probably do ok, but it´s Apple vs Microsoft Part II: Apple is again focusing on hardware instead of software and Google is doing what Microsoft did in the 80´- focusing on software. I hope Apple can learn from the past. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/21/cashmore.iphone.cool/index.html
Permalink Reply by Patricio Buenrostro-Gilhuys on May 21, 2010 at 2:26pm Patricio, I was just about to post that article! Hey Patricio, what does the iPhone/Android usage look like in Mexico?
Patricio Buenrostro-Gilhuys said:In the long run I think Android is better positioned. The new iPhone will probably do ok, but it´s Apple vs Microsoft Part II: Apple is again focusing on hardware instead of software and Google is doing what Microsoft did in the 80´- focusing on software. I hope Apple can learn from the past. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/21/cashmore.iphone.cool/index.html

Nicholas Nagao posted a status1 member
1 member
1 member
2 members
2 members
© 2012 Created by Nicholas Nagao.